Colin Beavan. Fingerprints: The Origins of Crime Detection and the Murder Case that Launched Forensic Science. Hyperion, 2001.
A very interesting read, especially for a true crime and mystery buff. What stood out for me was the connection Beavan makes between urbanization and the need to devise reliable means of identification. In rural areas and smaller villages, everyone knew everyone. Once rural populations fled to the cities, no one knew anyone else. Sometimes police officers or prison guards would recognize previously convicted felons, but even this, as with eye-witness identification, is often unreliable. The French (Bertillon) began a system of measurements, but classification was difficult, too difficult for most policemen "in the field." A doctor working in Japan (Faulds) and an official working in India (Herschel) devised ways of taking and classifying fingerprints. Then the task became one of convincing police and the courts to accept prints as evidence, and of claiming and awarding credit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DANIEL MARTIN
John Fowles. DANIEL MARTIN. Collins, 1977. Re-read this old novel for about the 3rd or 4th time and wrote about it on my Substack newslette...
.jpg)
-
Bully for You Can you believe it? I just heard it on the news--that still at least a third of the school districts (meaning countless number...
-
Jane Austen's Persuasion Believe it! Cover design matters. An old painting on a Penguin cover of Jane Austen's PERSUASION hooks m...
-
May 31, 2017 Bill Bryson. A Short History of Private Life. Doubleday, 2010. This is my third Bryson, 450 pages of information about the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment